Accueil Forum -> Games -> Jeux  >>  La sociologie de l'imaginaire
1 messages
Accueil Forum -> Games -> Jeux  >>  La sociologie de l'imaginaire
1 messages

La sociologie de l'imaginaire

10 juillet 2014 à 22:21 korial  

Je viens vous parler la sociologie de l'imaginaire (psychological anthropology) qui était une de matière préférée lorsque j'étais encore à la fac. Il s'agit (en gros) d'une discipline tentant de comprendre les mécanismes de l'inconscient collectif et d'analyser l'approche qu'à chaque culture vis-à-vis de nombreux thèmes.

J'ai combiné mes connaissances dans le domaine avec mon métier et ai publié en début d'année un article sur Gamasutra (site de jeux vidéo pro). J'y explique les bases de l'inconscient collectif, analyse le thème des monstres et démontre comment on peut exploiter efficacement ces connaissances dans les jeux vidéo avec l'exemple de The Last Of Us.
Attention ! Spoils !

L'article a été écrit en anglais, je le traduirai dès que possible.
La mise en forme passe mal sur le forum

Psychological antropology in video games a écrit:

A matter of images

The term "image" comes from the Latin word "imago" which refers to funeral masks painted during the first centuries of the Christian era. Images as studied in psychological anthropology are not strictly physical representations of either persons or places. It can have an infinite number of forms: family photographs, furniture, stamp collections, jewels, musical instruments...

These images are described as relics – or artificial images contrary to natural ones which are the immaterial results of an inner process triggered by striking memories. In fact, the artificial images only play as intermediaries to remind the natural ones / the past experiences. No matter the kind of object, it refers to a relationship that only an initiated person can decipher.

A portrait from
the Faiyoum Basin

A person sometimes transfers his image to his close relations. The most common example deals with collections: stamps, statuettes, rocks... Indeed, offering collectibles often becomes some kind of game / ritual. It is likely that the relations moreover get steeped in this spiral by definitely binding the collectibles to the collector.

It is important to note that an image never dies out: it remains latent as any unconscious mechanism. Although collections generally end in storage rooms like photographs fade, the collector always keeps the natural image deep down within himself. It can rise again while facing a similar relic, even several decades later.

These two characteristics actively participate in the development of the collective unconscious while applied to a larger and deeper scale. It is notably due to the propagation over centuries and the assimilation since the early childhood of tales, proverbs, religious teaching and any cultural elements .

That is how tales – like Little Red Riding Hood or Three Little Pigs for example – have matched the wolves to the archetype of the predator in the Western culture. Yet, wolves only attack man at extremely rare occasions. It is even venerated as protectors in other cultures, especially in Japan.

Wolves in the Western culture

Wolves in the Asian culture
(picture from Princess Mononoke)

Contrary to the example here-above, most of civilizations share the same images – especially in ancient ones where religions hold a primordial position. There are the collective images that we should take in consideration.

The Monsters

The theme of "monsters" is shared by almost all the civilizations. The classical definition refers to hybrid creatures stuck between two worlds. Here some examples from the Greek culture:

  • Cerberus: a three-headed dog, son of a Titan and a woman half-human half-serpent. It guards the entrance of the underworld on the banks of the Styx. Venomous snakes coils around his neck. It represents the absence of expiation: mortals must face the acts done in the past, the present and the future (hence the three heads).

  • Gorgons whom the most famous version deals with the beautiful Medusa transformed in a monster by the envious Athena. These creatures have snakes for hair and can turn anyone who looks at them to stone. It represents the powerlessness of mortals facing Gods. In Ancient Greece, a lot of people used to wear gorgonians (amulets showing a Gorgon head) to protect themselves from curses and evil spirits.

  • The Minotaur: a blood-thirsty creature with the head of a bull on a body of a man. It borned from a white bull sent by Poseidon and King Minos' wife. In reality, the Minotaur might be King Minos himself and represents the consequences of yielding to one's primal pulsions.

Classical monsters are repulsive, hostile, primal (in contrast with the modern society), have several arms, sticky tentacles, large glassy eyes… They are frightening – especially for children who have many nightmares until 6 years old. Thus, nightmares are an important part of the cerebral maturation process. It allows the child to exteriorize the anxiety he can’t express by other means. The fact that most of the monsters are anthropomorphic – i.e. look like humans – greatly participates in this process by binding the child’s anxiety to himself.

Using monsters in video games is an excellent way to create an instant challenge: the player faces it without the need of any explanation as a defensive reaction. It can also make the player jumping or create an insane / disturbing atmosphere like the Silent Hill series. This however only works in the short term: facing monsters becomes a routine and the game tension considerably decreases once the player has overcome his fear. Likewise, the player unconscious matches the monsters to the player anxiety and generates satisfaction / relief while defeating it. The best example that comes to my mind is Doom 3 which gradually becomes a classical FPS where the player can easily guess where next enemies will spawn - breaking the surprise effect and psychologically getting him ready for the fight.

Let's now study the modern definition of the term – i.e. the image nowadays people have. You can see below a street interview carried out in 2005 by the social studies department of the Pierre Mendes France University. The question asked was: "What do you consider as monstrous?".

Results from the street interview

The people who were questioned often answer "Outlaws" (Human / Real) which includes all kinds of criminals from juvenile deliquents to serial killes. Serial killers are always described by medias and victims' families as "monsters", "aliens " or "predators". People don't choose these words randomly. Indeed, binding the image of monsters to criminals sentenced for dark or barbaric acts is a perfect way to differentiate ourselves from something we can't understand and at the same to define our own identity (for further information about this self-defining process, see also the Valladolid debate or the trial scene in Planet of the Apes if you prefer sci-fi).

The Last of Us is an excellent example to both support this differentiation process and to show that classical and modern monsters can work together in a same story.

The two protagonists - Joel and Ellie - mainly encounter Infected during the first hours of the game. The Infected get more and more monstrous to keep the player under pressure: Runners, Stalkers, Clickers and then Bloaters. To prevent him getting bored, the story gradually focuses on the relations between survivors. The more it progresses, the more the opponents look like Joel who is himself “a brutal survivor having lost everything he valued in life and with few moral lines left to cross”. The game then takes a darker turn, fuzzing the difference between humans and monsters and making the player wondering what he would do in situations like that.

The story finally reaches its climax during the Chapter 9 “Lakeside Resort” when Ellie meets a group of survivors leaded by a character named David - Joel is supposed to be dead at this moment. It turns out that David and his group are terrifying cannibals. The soldiers and the raiders that Joel and Ellie previously met were acting as groups without any leader or personality. At the contrary, the player gets intimate with David when Ellie fights beside him and shares her fire camp. He so becomes more than a simple opponent and embodies the perfect archetype of the Shadow as Joseph Campbell described it - i.e. the darkest side of the protagonist pushed to the extreme. David also acts as a catalyst: by facing him, the player facing the whole group of cannibals, absolves Joel’s past behavior and confirms that he is still “human”. This is - in my humble opinion - the best part of the game.

The dramatic structure of The Last Of Us
as I felt it (click to enlarge)

To summarize, classical monsters are a perfect way to create an instant challenge: they are frightening, hostile and the player naturally fights it as a defensive reaction and as a part of an unconscious process of self-defining. At the contrary, humans embody better villains and have a deeper impact on the player if they are correctly introduced and own genuine identities. Sure, humans are individually less frightening than classical monsters but they refer to the cruelty of the real life, the fear to get involved in such events and force the player to face his own dark side.

Voilà ! J'espère que ça vous a plu.

Message édité le 2014-07-10 22:27:46 par korial